This is chilling footage. On a side note, it has always been my feeling that Russia and Iran were really the culprits behind 9/11. Bush should have come clean about that, but he was worried about the implications of pointing his finger at Putin, the former KGB boss.
Felix Dzerzhinsky - KGB founder was born on 9/11/1877. This little fact is never mentioned by the socialist scum in the media. Gee, I wonder why?
The Washington Times reported that on 9/11, there were Russian fighter jets doing military exercises in the Atlantic and the Pacific. They were acting as decoys to make sure that the hijacked jets hit their targets. Cheney called Moscow and he asked them to stop their training and they did, but it was too late at that point.
The real rage exploded inside of me when I walked through ground zero for the first time about 2 days after the attacks. It was like a war zone and it was so unbelievable that you at times thought you were on a movie set.
White ashes covered entire streets, police vehicles, ambulances and fire trucks for blocks. Some of these vehicles were crushed and set on fire by the falling debris. The smoldering pile of rubble was also something I would never forget, because you knew that the bodies of 3,000 people were underneath that debris.
The rescue workers had to keep changing boots, because they would melt from the hot metal. I did not work on the pile, I was doing security for a few months...along with other patrol duties.
My nasal passages were constantly breathing in the black soot and the smell of burning bodies was in the air for many miles. These are things that people do not know, unless they have been there.
1 - Russia converted Rubble from the U.S. $ exchange rate to gold
one month before the 9/11 attack. When asked about such unprecedented step, Russian official gave unsatisfactory answers....
2 - According to the 2003 statement of former Czech BIS Intelligence Service Capt. Vladimir Hucin, the 9/11 hijacker Mohammad Atta was in fact trained in Czechoslovakia in 1988 in the very well known terrorist training camp Zastavka near city of Brno [the training took proximately 18 months according to statements to this extent, this camp was also near Czech military base Vyskov where possibly terrorists were trained in combat terrorist operational practices.]
3 - The reason why Soviet Red Army invaded Afghanistan at the
end of 1970s can be shown that it was not for the purpose to capture the territory for any gain other than to create artificial legend for the upcoming "democratic" Russia that Russian "former" communists
have nothing to do with Islamic terrorism and that these are fully "independent" operations of the Muslim terrorist groups and states, including Iraq, Iran, Syria etc. Russian and Chinese involvement must remain hidden, for if it was revealed and recognized, communists would loose their much needed element of surprise [as for example
the old Chinese military strategy Sun Tzu directs.]
4 - It is clear that just based on the deceptive background of these various strategic operations, including the major Soviet - Russian communist deception and long-term fraud called Perestroika, Russian "former" communists cannot be possibly seen behind anything that harms America, including the 9/11 attack.
5 - The organization of the entire "Islamic" terrorist network, including all terrorist groups of the KGB founded PLO [Hamas etc. - Yaser Arafat was a KGB long term agent, another such comparable Moscow asset is Libya's Muamar Qadaffi], is too perfect and too well organized which doesn't suggest that some "horseback riders" of Al Qaeda are capable to keep themselves organized, supplied with weapons, intelligence, logistical support and good level military training. The state sponsorship behind such groups is visible - but which state is behind
it [Russia, China etc.] escapes the most of the western analysts.
6 - The western [flawed] thinking, not accustomed to communist evil practices, disables beforehand any recognition of any long-term communist planning and operational strategy. [Russian, Chinese etc.] Communist "word of honor" is accepted, also based on the materialist western doctrine that as long as these "no longer communist" countries can produce cheap products for the West, they have no other intentions other than to be economically competitive with the West.
This totally naive assumption does not take into account the criminal nature of these communist regimes, their strategic planning and
their full long-term commitment to implement communism around
the World.
On this year's anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, there was a sudden surge in the activity of U.S. hedge funds originating from overseas... like Dubai. There was a sharp rise in "short selling" of stocks, similar to the suspicious trades in the days preceding September 11, 2001. According to one well-known economist, the same institutions attacked on 9/11 are those suffering now. Coincidence?
26 September 2008: A week ago, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) took the unprecedented step of temporarily banning the fairly common practice of “short selling” securities in response to the widening economic crisis in the U.S. The essence of the ban is that the SEC has placed a hold on “short selling” in 799 financial institutions until October 2, 2008, in tandem with the FSA, which is the British counterpart of the SEC.
In a press release issued September 19, 2008, the SEC made the following announcement (excerpt):
The Securities and Exchange Commission, acting in concert with the U.K. Financial Services Authority, today took temporary emergency action to prohibit short selling in financial companies to protect the integrity and quality of the securities market and strengthen investor confidence. The U.K. FSA took similar action yesterday.
In its most basic definition, short selling (or selling short) is the act of a person or entity selling a security instrument, such as a stock, expecting, for whatever reason, that the price of the security will decline. For example, a person sells the stock today to a buyer at the current price, buying the stock back later at the anticipated reduced price, keeping the difference as profit. Because a person does not actually own the stock they are selling, such transactions are conducted through securities lenders, such as Goldman Sachs, for example.
The concept of short selling is rather simple: the greater the decline of the particular stock, the more money the seller stands to make in pure profit. The inverse is also true: should the value of the stock rise, the seller would then lose money on the transaction. Perhaps the biggest factor that one must keep in mind about selling short is this: the profit is limited but the loss is unlimited. Therefore, the short seller is taking an exceptional risk when engaging in such transactions -an important fact as you read on.
Short selling of stocks: Sound familiar?
At least in part, short selling transactions have been identified as contributing to the demise or imminent demise of a number of longstanding and historically revered investment firms, including but not limited to Lehman Brothers. According to analysts and experts in the financial markets, there has been a very sharp upsurge in market transactions of this type, ultimately causing a portion of the market woes that we are presently experiencing within our financial markets.
Many might recall one of the murkier aspects of 9/11 conspiracy theories involves the speculation of airline stocks in the weeks before the attacks. It has been proven that the options market for United and American Airlines, two of the airlines involved in the attacks, was unusually busy in the days before 9/11 with an extremely heavy volume of "put options," or selling the stocks “short.” The activity was unusual enough that both the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) initiated investigations into the unusual trading activity.
Concurrent with the publication of the 9/11 commission report, the Securities and Exchange Commission stated that they found no evidence of U.S. trading based on inside information related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack that resulted in wide price swings in some options contracts.
It is important to note that investigation conducted by the SEC and their counterparts was narrowly focused. I am making this statement from my professional opinion as an investigator, and with full knowledge that such a statement will undoubtedly come under attack, citing the fact that the investigation encompassed a review of 103 companies, trading in seven markets, and involved numerous other domestic and foreign oversight and law enforcement agencies.
Consider, however, that the primary focus of the investigation was to determine whether this activity could have been the result of advance knowledge of the attacks, with the trades made for the sole purpose of profiting from the attacks. The focus, as a matter of practicality and necessity, appears to have been rather limited in its scope. But what if those suspicious transactions were not done to merely profit from the attacks, but were part of a larger attack on Wall Street - and the U.S. economy - involving more than those trades?
I’m no economist, so I will defer to the recent statements attributed to Joe Besecker of Emerald Asset Management Company. He was the subject of an article titled Terror Attack on US Financials? Details of SEC Short Ban.
The following is excerpted from that article, referencing the musings of Mr. Besecker:
"He [Joe Besecker] raised an intriguing issue: None of the many hedgies he knew were pressing their bets recently. The bear raids on the banks and brokers were NOT a case of piling on by US based hedge funds. And from what he was seeing and hearing about in terms of order flow, the vast majority of the financial short selling the past week or so were being done overseas. It appears that the lion's share of shorting was coming out of overseas bourses such as London and Dubai.It may not be a coincidence that the financial short selling ban is both here and in London.
Then there is another coincidence: The huge increase in shorting of the financials occurred on the anniversary of 9/11. And on top of that, the same institutions attacked on 9/11/01 were the ones suffering in recent days.
Joe asked the question: Is anyone investigating whether this is a case of financial terrorism?
Obviously, I believe that the majority of the blame for our current financial crisis lies with unethical CEOs of various financial organizations, the lack of oversight of government subsidized entities such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, white collar criminals, and some members of Congress. With the countless threats made before and since 9/11 against the U.S. economy, however, isn't it possible that some aspects of our recent economic woes has been - or is being caused by our enemies? Were the threats posted against Wall Street by Islamic terrorists, some with financial backing from the Saudi's, interpreted too literally?
I'm not entirely convinced that the SEC investigation into the whole aspect of trading activity concurrent with the 9/11 attacks was performed honestly or adequately. Considering we are now being asked to contribute to a bailout of unfathomable proportions, aren't we entitled to get some real answers to legitimate questions?
I have always said that Aug 6th (the Anniversary of Hiroshima) is a day that we need to watch FOREVER. Putin, Ahmadinejad and Bin Laden have all mentioned this date for propaganda purposes.
I was browsing an astrology page and I was shocked when i saw that he did an astrology chart and in that chart he predicted a MAJOR nuclear war on Aug 6th, 2010. Needless to say, I got chills when I saw that...
A major terrorist attack on the United States, probably featuring a weapon of mass destruction, is inevitable during the next four to five years, says Marvin J. Cetron, the futurist who predicted 9/11 with alarming insight.
During an exclusive interview with Newsmax, Cetron said the attack could come in as little as two-and-a-half to three years.
Cetron, who startled and embarrassed the intelligence community with his study “Terror 2000,” has let the genie out of the bottle again with his latest report, “55 Trends Now Shaping the Future of Terrorism.”
When Newsmax asked how the expert and founder of Forecasting International Inc. (FI) can be so sure of the impending disasters, he said he needed to guard his classified sources.
“Let me put it this way: We have so many good sources of signals intelligence and human intelligence that lets us know what doesn’t show up in the press,” he said.
FI, which produced “55 Trends” has conducted an ongoing study of the forces changing our world for almost half a century in support of clients ranging from General Motors to the YMCA, and from the Central Intelligence Agency to the White House.
“Terror 2000,” another FI project that was done for the Department of Defense in 1994, warned that terrorists were planning to use commercial aircraft as guided bombs to strike against a major landmark in the New York City area. It also warned that terrorists could hijack a commercial airliner, fly it down the Potomac, and crash it into the Pentagon.
Tragically, the report was filed and forgotten.
Cetron hopes this will not be the case with “55 Trends,” a 252-page treatise that is very short on any good news and includes the disturbing conclusion that worldwide terror networks are stronger today than at the time of 9/11. It also contends that the cells are not taking orders but are free to attack when, where, and how they want.
“We’re not talking about al-Qaida running these operations,” Cetron says. “We’re talking about cells and they are self-invigorated, if you will. They run on their own. The second thing that’s a real problem in this is that they don’t take orders. They do what they think is going to be good in their own local sphere.”
Cetron is not talking only about cells overseas.
http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/cetron_terror_attack/2008/09/10/129636.html
MOSCOW, September 3 (RIA Novosti) - Russia confirmed on Wednesday that Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov will visit Poland on September 11 to discuss U.S. missile shield plans, the Georgia conflict, and ties with the EU.
The Foreign Ministry said Lavrov will meet with his counterpart, Radoslaw Sikorski, and Prime Minister Donald Tusk.
"I am positive that an agreement between Poland and the United States to deploy missile defenses in the [Central European] country, the situation in the Caucasus, and other international issues will be raised," ministry spokesman Andrei Nesterenko said.
"I think talks will [also] be held on prospects for relations between Russia and the EU," he added."
Russia opposes the U.S. plans for a missile shield in Central Europe as a threat to its national security. Moscow earlier warned it would be forced to target its missiles at Poland if the former Soviet-bloc state hosted the interceptor missiles.
Warsaw formally agreed to the deployment of 10 U.S. interceptor missiles on its territory in mid-August. In early July, the U.S. also signed an agreement with Prague to place a radar station in the Czech Republic.
Sikorski said after the missile deal with Washington that Lavrov had cancelled his planned September visit to the country. The Polish Foreign Ministry said however the next day that Moscow had not formally confirmed the cancellation of Lavrov's visit. Sikorski then backtracked on his statement, saying it was a "misunderstanding."
Prime Minister Tusk earlier said the missiles and the accompanying U.S. military aid were needed to protect the country from Russia.
Poland was also among Russia's strongest critics over last month's armed conflict with Georgia, insisting on EU sanctions against Moscow.
Moscow recognized Georgia's breakaway South Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent states on August 26, two weeks after Georgian troops launched an attack to retake South Ossetia.
Both South Ossetia and Abkhazia broke away from Georgia in the early 1990s, and had enjoyed de facto independence for many years.
NOTICE - YOU NEVER HEARD THIS IN THE MEDIA -> This is very interesting and it explains what the conspiracy nuts keep saying. They claim that on 9/11/01, VP Cheney had taken control of all NORAD operations in the USA. The US Government knew something was coming and they obviously knew that Russia might have something to do with it too. I guess they were expecting a possible attack by the Russians was coming soon after the 9/11 attacks happened ...
There were reports that day that said the Air Force was doing exercises to prevent a Russian attack via fighter jets. The Russian fighter jets acted as a distraction, so the hijacked planes could hit their targets.....
THE PLOT THICKENS.
On September 4 or 5, 2001 Russian fighter jets threatened to shoot down a US Navy P-3 surveillance plane in the North Pacific Ocean. The Washington Times reports:
Russian warplanes threatened patrolling U.S. Navy P-3 aircraft over the Pacific Ocean last week as the American planes monitored a military exercise in the region, The Washington Times has learned. At one point during the aerial harassment, a MiG-31 interceptor pilot flew his jet within 50 feet of a P-3 maritime patrol and reconnaissance plane. The incident was similar to a Chinese aerial intercept that resulted in a collision earlier this year. One alarming sign of the Russian intercept was a radio message sent by one MiG-31 pilot to his base stating his fire-control radar had "locked on" to the U.S. surveillance plane, U.S. intelligence officials said. A radar "lock" is a pilot's final step before firing a guided missile. "It was a threatening action," said one official.
Five days later, during the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks against the USA, the neo-Soviet state was "coincidentally" holding pre-announced strategic bomber exercises over the Arctic, North Pacific, and North Atlantic Oceans. The Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) reports that "the main task was reportedly to penetrate air defense of NATO and North America (NORAD)."
Maneuvers to simulate defense against a large-scale airspace attack began on September 10. According to Chief of the Air Force Anatoli Kornukov, they were intended to cover the whole Arctic, as well as northern parts of the Pacific and the Atlantic oceans, including, specifically, the vicinity of Norway, Iceland, the United States, Canada, and Great Britain. The main task was reportedly to penetrate air defense of NATO and North America (NORAD). As part of the exercise, long-range bombers were moved to auxiliary bases in Anadyr, Tiksi, and Vorkuta. A new element of these maneuvers was, according to newspaper reports, training for the use of long-range ALCMs outside the reach of NORAD (since Russia has had long-range nuclear ALCMs since the 1980s, apparently these reports meant conventional ALCMs, which began to appear in Russian Armed Forces only in the late 1990s). The only real launches planned in these regions involved short-range missiles launched from Tu-22M3 over Kamchatka Peninsula in a simulated attack against an aircraft carrier group.
Immediately following the attacks, the White House contacted the Kremlin and insisted that the Russians cancel their air force's "exercises." The Washington Post reports: "U.S. officials also sent a message to the Russians, who were planning a military exercise not far from Alaska, urging them to rethink their plans." At the link above NTI relates a similar post-attack scenario:
The plan was abruptly changed immediately after news of terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, DC on September 11, 2001 reached Moscow. To avoid possible complications and misperceptions, the [Russian] Air Force terminated all “practical activities” planned for the ongoing maneuvers following a request from the United States. This included a termination of flights not only toward U.S. territory, but also “around the corner” toward Norway and Iceland. Launches of short-range ALCMs from five Tu-22M3 bombers (three belonging to the Naval Air Command and two from the Air Force) over Kamchatka against seaborne targets were still conducted, but only within Russian territorial waters. Also, both heavy and medium bombers practiced missile launches at an internal Russian test range near the Caspian sea.
On Monday, September 17, 2007 state-run Novosti has announced that Russian strategic bombers which, in any case, have resumed permanent patrols per President Vladimir Putin's August 17 announcement, will again be conducting maneuvers between the 18th and 21st of this month.
http://thefinalphaseforum.invisionzone.com/index.php?showtopic=1734
