Showing posts with label bill clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bill clinton. Show all posts

Sunday, February 15, 2009

America’s First Communist President

In 1967 I knew that Bill Clinton would one day be President of the United States of America. Richard Nixon learned about it in 1972 and Hillary Rodham learned about it in 1973!

Who am I and how good is my information? Is this just another attack against President Bill Clinton? Another "right wing conspiracy?" Let me tell you my story and I'll give you all the proof possible that the statement in this headline is absolutely correct! There is plenty of circumstantial evidence to support the statement. There is material evidence in the KGB archives in Moscow that could shed a lot more light on what could be the greatest shock of the year 2,000, "Clinton’s Biggest Lie."

In 1972 I was convinced that Richard Nixon was going to reveal this information to the American people. He didn't. Instead, he chose to resign in disgrace. Hillary Rodham could have gone public with the information she learned in 1973 but she decided that opportunity was knocking at her door. Instead of calling the FBI, she decided to marry Bill Clinton who later became our President.

The story may sound far-fetched to you. However, when I give you the details, names, and dates it should be easy for you to verify the facts. If anyone should ask me why I didn't reveal this information to anyone in the last 33 years, the explanation is very simple.

• Only a small number of close friends and my wife knew about it. However, no one had any idea what to do with this information. And I still don't know what to do with it.

• Bill Clinton is suspected of being involved in the murders of at least 80 people. If you go to any of the anti-Clinton websites on the Internet, you will see lists of people who had mysterious car crashes, mysterious suicides, mysterious airplane crashes, and some were even shot execution style. I didn't want me or my wife to become one of these statistics. And I still prefer anonymity versus being a celebrity.

• Another problem is that no one had any hard evidence against Clinton. It was always "he said, she said" or "he did, she did." In the case of Monica Lewinsky, there was finally hard evidence - the semen stain on her infamous blue dress. That was the only time he was a little careless. Otherwise he could easily say he had nothing to do with her. He was never caught in anything - pretty slick for a crook who spent his whole career in public life. Paula Jones? Clinton gave her a gift of $900,000. So I have the same problem as the others: To find hard evidence against him.

Genifer Flowers was the only person who lived to tell about her life with Bill Clinton. Few other women who were raped by Bill Clinton lived to tell the truth. Obviously there is no good reason to kill someone after the information is already out unless you want to bring more suspicion upon yourself.

So, in order to protect myself and my family, I printed copies of this report and distributed them among friends so they can send them out in case we have a "mysterious accident." I made these copies to:

• Protect my life and that of my family

• Use all investigative forces we have to go out and dig up the truth

• The country and the world deserves to know that Bill Clinton and Al Gore are the most crooked, poisonous, and lethal leaders America ever had.

If Al Gore had been elected President, his administration would have been just be a continuation of Bill Clinton's plan to make sure communism is spread world-wide and change America from a capitalistic country to a socialist one.

How do I fit into this picture? How do I know that Bill Clinton is a communist spy?

It’s a long story, but let me unravel it slowly so you can understand how an absolutely uninvolved bystander like myself can have information of such magnitude. Let me start at the beginning ...........

I was born 1940 in communist Czechoslovakia. Actually, this is incorrect. I was born in Mahren and Bohmen. This is what Czechoslovakia was called during the Nazi Occupation. When people ask me where I was born I always answer "Czechoslovakia" because this is the country name people are familiar with.

It was a trying time to live under Nazi Occupation. In 1948 the communists took over the government in a coup d’etat ... they put a gun to the president's head and "asked" for his resignation. If that was not enough, they threw the Minister of Foreign Affairs out the window. This was the beginning of communism in Czechoslovakia. I'll spare you the details, but knowing how communism began in Czechoslovakia is vital to understanding the relationships among the players in this account.

My father was a communist. My mother was a staunch anti-communist. My father's brother was a communist and his wife was a communist. My mother's brother, also an anti-communist, was arrested several times for suspicion of anti-communist acts. Nothing was ever proven, so they let him go. The men had to keep jobs and support families. Whether they believed in communism or not didn't make any difference. They became party members so they could keep their jobs.

Somehow I was the apple that rolled far away from the tree. I was known as a staunch anti-communist. It was very dangerous to have such a reputation, but what do you do when your career was ruined at nine years of age. (A nosy neighbor reported you to the "appropriate people" because she heard overheard me playing with my friends and say the American Air Force was the best.) The report the neighbor made on me as a nine year old boy flying the American plane came to life and began haunting me when the time came for me to select a profession, the college to attend, type of job, salary, and everything else that could affect my adult life. In other words, the "authorities" determined that at the age of nine, I was already a solid anti-communist!

Somewhere in the early 1960’s I met a woman who was a member of the Communist party and later married her. I guess the situation among friends and family was so complex because of party affiliations that we lived in a world where we didn't trust anybody. It was considered normal for a son to report his father to the authorities for anti-communist activities. So you had family gatherings where some family members were Communists and others were not. You don't destroy family values because of political affiliations. On the other hand we very seldom discussed politics because if we did, we would end up in huge arguments with each other.

Now you are probably wondering how a staunch anti-communist like myself could marry a woman who was not only a party member, but had access to some of the most confidential information. Of course I didn't know that when we met.

Her father held the rank of Major in the Secret Police but used a different job title as a cover. But we were young. I guess her party membership was good for one thing. I acquired some powerful friends that could help me get out of jail if I ever crossed the line of acceptance of what I could and could not do. Later I discovered that my father’s nephew (my cousin) was a Colonel in the Secret Police. All of these people were cooperatives of the Soviet KGB.

I have not seen the structure of the Communist party explained properly in the West. At least I never read a knowledgeable book about it. But I am not going to go into the details of the bureaucracy. I'm just going to give you a few examples to prove that I know what I am talking about and how the structure of each organization was important for me to get information that Bill Clinton is, indeed, a Communist spy.

The Communists established a "route" you had to take in order to become Chairman of the Politburo or First Secretary of the party. I'll give you two examples. Boris Yeltsin was the First Secretary of the Soviet Communist Party of the Moscow organization. In other words, before you could become Chairman, you had to run the capitol city’s party organization. From that position you could step up to Party Chairman Secretary.

Another example is Alexander Dubcek. Before he could become First Party Secretary, he was put in charge of the Prague (capitol city of Czechoslovakia) organization. This in itself was a little odd because he was a Slovak and the Czechs and Slovaks never got along very well. (There was also a language difference.) This stems from World War II when the Slovaks betrayed everybody by becoming a Nazi state and supporting Adolph Hitler.

There was another part of the structure which has critical importance for my story. Absolutely critical. The top leaders - I mean the First Secretaries and the other top honchos of the party organization belonged to their local organization. In other words, Dubcek belonged and was making visits to his own local organization somewhere in Slovakia. It is vital that you understand this part of the party structure in Czechoslovakia. I can't say the same about all other communist countries. I simply don't know and never had any interest to find out.

There is another important factor on the route to the position of First Secretary of the Communist party. You had to be trained and educated at Lenin-Marx University in Moscow. You had to speak Russian. Those people who would go to Moscow for further training would become future party dignitaries, ministers of the government, or President. Without that training you couldn't get anywhere.


CONTINUED........

http://www.roadtowealth.com/GPStory.htm

Monday, January 26, 2009

Bill & Hillary Clinton Give the Cold Shoulder to 'Jihad' Jimmy Carter

Big liberal EGO ELITISTS.........

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Bill Clinton Received $500 Million in Donations for His Library

The American people are clueless, because they love this communist thug and his wife. The media and the libtards have been playing up the Saudi connection to Bush, but they never seem to report the Saudi connection to Clinton.

Clinton has also been linked to a another communist from Kazakhstan that gave major cash to Bill's library. It is hilarious to think that the media has the nerve to link the republicans to the rich, when you have Obama, Kerry and Clinton worth over $2 billion combined.

Sunday, September 28, 2008

1999 Times Article: Fannie Mae Under Pressure From Clinton to Expand Mortgage Loans to Low Income People

Attention ADRI


Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending

Published: September 30, 1999

In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders.

The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets -- including the New York metropolitan region -- will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.

In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates -- anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans.

''Fannie Mae has expanded home ownership for millions of families in the 1990's by reducing down payment requirements,'' said Franklin D. Raines, Fannie Mae's chairman and chief executive officer. ''Yet there remain too many borrowers whose credit is just a notch below what our underwriting has required who have been relegated to paying significantly higher mortgage rates in the so-called subprime market.''

Demographic information on these borrowers is sketchy. But at least one study indicates that 18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional loan market.

In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's.

''From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,'' said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. ''If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.''

Under Fannie Mae's pilot program, consumers who qualify can secure a mortgage with an interest rate one percentage point above that of a conventional, 30-year fixed rate mortgage of less than $240,000 -- a rate that currently averages about 7.76 per cent. If the borrower makes his or her monthly payments on time for two years, the one percentage point premium is dropped.

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, does not lend money directly to consumers. Instead, it purchases loans that banks make on what is called the secondary market. By expanding the type of loans that it will buy, Fannie Mae is hoping to spur banks to make more loans to people with less-than-stellar credit ratings.

Fannie Mae officials stress that the new mortgages will be extended to all potential borrowers who can qualify for a mortgage. But they add that the move is intended in part to increase the number of minority and low income home owners who tend to have worse credit ratings than non-Hispanic whites.

Home ownership has, in fact, exploded among minorities during the economic boom of the 1990's. The number of mortgages extended to Hispanic applicants jumped by 87.2 per cent from 1993 to 1998, according to Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies. During that same period the number of African Americans who got mortgages to buy a home increased by 71.9 per cent and the number of Asian Americans by 46.3 per cent.



Sunday, August 31, 2008

Sunday, June 29, 2008